Skip to content

Watch the video

OpenAI GPT-5 Launch: A New Era for Vibe Coding

Key themes and important facts surrounding the launch of OpenAI's GPT-5 models, drawing heavily from "GPT-5: Everything You Need to Know." The overwhelming emphasis of the launch, despite other notable advancements, was on GPT-5's capabilities in coding, signalling a significant shift in OpenAI's strategic focus and a potential democratisation of software development.

1. The Dominance of Coding: OpenAI's Singular Focus

OpenAI's GPT-5 launch presentation made an "extremely loud argument that there is one singular AI use case that matters" – coding. While acknowledging broader applications of AI, the company's presentation and the subsequent early reviews consistently highlighted the models' unparalleled advancements in this domain. This focus is particularly notable given that OpenAI had previously "historically been slightly behind" competitors like Anthropic's Claude series (3.5 Sonnet, 3.7 Sonnet, Opus 4, and 4.1) in the coding space.

Quotes reflecting this emphasis include:

"If you were just watching this presentation to get up to speed on where the big labs thought the AI competition was I'm not sure that you would believe that there is any use case that OpenAI cared about except coding."

"When push comes to shove this presentation was entirely about coding."

"Michael Troll the CEO of Cursor come up during the presentation and say in no uncertain terms that GBT5 was the smartest coding model they've tried."

This strategic focus on coding is seen as an attempt to "catch up in this very key area" and potentially reshape the landscape of software development, particularly through what is termed "vibe coding."

2. "Vibe Coding" and the Democratisation of Code-Based Creation

A central theme emerging from the GPT-5 launch is the concept of "vibe coding" – the ability to create complex software with minimal human intervention, often through natural language prompts. GPT-5 is presented as a catalyst for expanding the "parabola of who gets to create with code," enabling a new generation of "protovibe developers."

Key insights on vibe coding:

  • Transformative Capability: Matt Schumer's experience highlighted this transformation: "GPT5 wasn't incremental... it turned what I confidently thought was a multi-month engineering challenge into a casual 1-hour sprint. This is serious real autonomous software engineering." He further stated, "You can now vibe code real software not just simple SAS apps but real technical software."
  • Shifting Paradigms: Felix from Lovable succinctly put it: "GPT4 was build me a to-do app gpt5 is build me a SAS with user off payments admin dashboard and email automation we're not improving code generation we're eliminating the need to code."
  • Agentic Behaviour and Tool Use: A significant leap for GPT-5 is its enhanced ability to "think with" tools and use them in parallel. Ben Hilock noted, "gbt5 doesn't just use tools it thinks with them it builds with them." This allows GPT-5 to tackle "gnarly nested dependency conflicts" and debug "three layers of nested abstractions," tasks that previously stumped other advanced models.

3. Performance Benchmarks and Real-World Impact

GPT-5 introduces several models (GPT-5, GPT-5 Mini, GPT-5 Nano), all boasting 400k context lengths and competitive costs. While OpenAI primarily compared GPT-5 to its predecessors (GPT-4o, GPT-3), independent benchmarks confirm its top-tier performance.

Key performance highlights:

  • Swebench Verified: A controversial chart during the presentation showed GPT-5 (with thinking) achieving 74.9% accuracy on Swebench Verified, significantly outperforming GPT-4o (30.8%) and GPT-3 (69.1%).
  • Artificial Analysis: Independent testing by Artificial Analysis placed GPT-5 high and medium versions at the top, scoring 69% and 68% respectively, slightly above Grok 4. It excelled in MMLU, Humanity's Last Exam, AIM, and particularly Long Context Reasoning.
  • Long Context Reasoning & Task Completion: GPT-5 showed significant gains in "long context reasoning," which is crucial for agentic contexts. It now leads in the metric measuring how long a model can successfully complete tasks (50% success rate), pushing it to "about 2 hours and 15 minutes."
  • Hallucinations and "Sickeness": OpenAI claims "way way lower" hallucination rates compared to GPT-3 and GPT-4o, achieved through "post-trained our models to reduce sickensy using conversations representative of production data."
  • Coding Prowess: Early adopters consistently praised GPT-5's coding abilities. Matthew Burman described it as a "coding master," successfully tackling complex challenges like Rubik's Cube tests, Excel/Word clones, and advanced physics problems. It excels at front-end development, producing UIs that are "way closer to convincingly human."
  • Refactoring and Debugging: Pedro Shirano noted GPT-5's ability to "refactor thousands of lines of code at once and also debugs large repos faster and with precision."

4. Other Use Cases and Mixed Reviews

While coding was paramount, OpenAI also highlighted other use cases:

  • Health: OpenAI controversially presented a cancer survivor's story, emphasising how ChatGPT aided her self-advocacy and decision-making in medical situations. This sparked debate about the potential tension between AI and the medical industry, with Elon Musk stating, "AI is already better than most doctors."
  • Writing: Reviews for writing were mixed. While some found GPT-5 to have a "good voice nuanced and expressive" and useful for drafting/polishing, it "cannot determine whether writing is good" for editing, failing tasks that Opus 4 passes. Leighton Space even found it "not really a great writer," preferring GPT-4.5 and DeepCar1.
  • Pair Programming vs. Delegation: Dan Shipper and Every's team observed that GPT-5 is a "very good programmer" for "pair programming," excelling at "research and debugging complex issues." However, they suggested it's "not yet built for true delegation," being more cautious than Opus 4.1.

5. Competition and Pricing Strategy

The AI landscape is highly competitive, with models like Google's Gemini 2.5, Anthropic's Claude series, and Deep Seek's R1 all vying for market share. OpenAI's decision to only compare GPT-5 to its own previous models in official presentations was noted as a strategic move to "keep the focus on OpenAI," though independent analyses reveal its leading position.

A significant competitive element is OpenAI's aggressive pricing strategy:

Cost Competitiveness: GPT-5's "really competitive costs" for input and output match Gemini 2.5, which has historically competed on price, and "absolutely blow anthropic out of the water." This positions GPT-5 as a high-performance, cost-effective option, potentially disrupting Anthropic's dominance, even if "Claude Opus 4.1 is better if it's 10 times as much."

6. The "Stone Age for Agents and LLMs" - AGI Implications

Ben Hilock's "stone age" theory offers a profound perspective on GPT-5's significance. He argues that GPT-5 represents the "beginning of the stone age for agents and LLMs" because "gbt5 doesn't just use tools it thinks with them it builds with them." This parallels the human ability to manifest intelligence through tools, suggesting a pivotal moment in the march towards AGI. He stated, "I think GPT5 is the closest to AGI we've ever been."

Conclusion

The launch of GPT-5 marks a pivotal moment for OpenAI, strongly emphasising its ambition in the coding domain. While improvements in areas like hallucination reduction and long context reasoning are significant, the ability to enable "vibe coding" of complex software, the strategic pricing, and the profound implications for agentic behaviour highlight a transformative step, potentially ushering in a new era for software development and bringing the industry "closer to AGI." The coming months will reveal the true extent of GPT-5's impact as more users engage with its capabilities.

Video